Prévia do material em texto
AULA 6 CONTEMPORARY NARRATIVES - LANGUAGE, CINEMA, AND LITERATURE Profª Liane von Mühlen 2 CONVERSA INICIAL And so here we are. The final lesson on the journey with contemporary narratives. By thinking, researching, writing, and reading the texts on this theme we also create narratives. Within the text and context of this creation, we bring our multiple identities and perspectives, together with culture(s) and our knowledge of the world. This chapter is a glance into the future, without neglecting the present, however. We start by discussing possibilities of narratology in educational contexts now and then, follow with reflections on the idea of life as narrative, making it personal and bringing it closer to students, and move on by proposing the understanding of how narratives can create a different future and empower people. Finally, we are introducing possible strategies and tools to work with narratives and summarizing the main ideas developed through the course TOPIC 1 – SHAPING OUR PRESENT AND FUTURE In the sense of discussing possibilities of narratology in educational contexts now and then, we start by saying that narratology has always had a great deal with creative writing in the education context. That narratives have changed along times is a fact, and that they are in constant movement is also true. Amon (2020), on this topic, mentions the evolution of narratives in the teaching learning process. The narratives that can be created in the context of a teaching-learning process have evolved alongside the technical means today available. Narratives are no longer restricted to a textual form and could be transmitted and received as an audiovisual product and have a significantly wide palette of forms appealing to a larger portion of the senses and allowing a better immersion in the world they present while requiring less effort on behalf of the audience. However, narrations are a communicative process, and as such it depends on the audience and its reaction. (Amon, 2020, p. 2) Among the technical means to which the author refers are the narratives produced and seen in multiplatform. It is so that we have heard of and seen more and more on the topic of transmedia narratives. From the traditional forms and ways of producing, reading, listening, and watching narratives, what seems to have caught the students’ attention more recently is related to their senses. Besides that, what young people look for is having experiences. Amon (2020) argues that, for 3 these students, interpretation, negotiation, and meaning making is what they expect to be able to do in the future. Teaching and learning experiences are a complex formed at least by visual, auditory, and verbal stimuli combined in specific modes, stimulating multilayered sensitive emotional experiences. These experiences should be conceptualized as one interconnected complex as far as students, as stated before, need to develop tools for interpretation, negotiation, and meaning-making of the information they are constantly exposed to. Taking into account that in a rapidly changing world it is not possible to conjecture what kind of knowledge will students need in their future lives, these experiences are highly relevant in any educational process. They need to be given tools for future interpretation of facts. Bare facts are meaningless for them. (Amon, 2020, p. 2) From oral and written narratives to a new concept of producing narratives, there is no way to deny how technology has changed and will modify even more the way we conceived the teaching-learning process. The combination of modes and means has taken narrative production to a new level and, at least to us, there is no going back to the old times and no way out of this digital reality. A combination of digitality aligned with students’ perceptions are promoting changes in the classroom. Amon (2020) reflects on education and technological development. In the field of art education it is worth noting in today’s school the fact that 5the majority of the pupils is in daily contact with digital media with its colorful, fast-moving sequences of images and, of course, computer programs that provide a wide range of possible uses and experimental experiences. Scanning and combining images, exploring the possibility of multiple printings, and the divergence between printed and screen images are only a few possible areas to consider. Numerous images are produced with widely available, highly interactive, and user-friendly software. These experiences do not only imply increasing speed of changing images, mechanical simplicity, and wide possibilities in the resolution of different technical processes but, perhaps most of all, a specific experience of space perception and representation, which every student carries with himself or herself to the classroom and is essential to education in general and to art education in particular, not to mention the fact that artworks can be easily shown in digital social media as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and others, creating new forms of artistic dialogs that were unimaginable two decades ago. Digital media is also making new and unique aesthetic experiences possible and changing the way in which art is conceived, created, and perceived. A new world has opened for artists as well as educators. Technological development requires the teaching profession to make changes at an unprecedented rate and opens a wide number of questions. Those connected with the impact of transmedia narratives via multimedia technologies on students are relevant to teaching as well as to artistic practice. (Amon, 2020, p. 2) By conceiving, creating, and perceiving art, including narratives, this way, has promoted an outnumber of experiences, not only for students, but also for teachers. Contemporary narratives are made of several styles and forms. They are diverse, multimodal, intercultural, multimedia, produced by and for people dealing 4 with stories, from the past or present, but there is also criticality in the search of understanding text and context, as well as acting for a future with more possibilities. As already mentioned before, narratives are contextual. Van der Mieroop, Clifton and Schnurr (2022, p. 3), in research on narratives as social practice in organizational contexts, bring a definition of context related to narratives: “‘context’ is a multi-layered concept, and while it is thus possible that narrators make relevant a multiplicity of contextual layers in the stories they tell, often the exploration of the relation between narratives and ‘only’ one or two contextual layers in capitalized on”. This makes us think of how often we have perceived or analyzed basically one, at most two, layers. What is more, are we aware of the multiplicity of contextual layers? In which contextual layers do narratives occur? When it comes to education, we have access to the documents and norms which regulate the system. In Brazil, according to BNCC – Base Nacional Comum Curricular (Brasil, 2018), in the section dedicated to high school education, the document mentions that in all fields of social action, certain abilities should the contemplated. In working with the Portuguese language, with the so-called practices of reading, listening, texts production (oral, written, multi-semiotic) and linguistic/semiotic analyzes, when it comes to abilities, the recommendation involving narratives is that students should be conducted to prepare scripts for the production of various videos (vlog, video clip, video short, documentary etc.), theatrical presentations, multimedia and transmedia narratives, podcasts, commented playlists, etc., to expand the possibilities of meaning production and engage reflexivelyin authorial and collective practices. (Brasil, 2018, p. 499, own translation) Narratives as the orientation brings it refers to multimedia and transmedia narratives, which implies using technology. Key words listed as aim are meaning, engagement, and reflexivity during and after the practices. Apart from abilities, BNCC also orientates for competencies to be developed by students. In the section on Applied Humanities and Social Sciences, still in high school, the guide brings as competence to be achieved: operationalize concepts such as temporality, memory, identity, society, territoriality, spatiality, etc. and different languages and narratives that express knowledge, beliefs, values, and practices that allow accessing information, solving problems, and, especially, favoring the necessary protagonism both at the individual and collective level. (Brasil, 2018, p. 559, own translation) 5 Also, here it points to language and narratives as means for students to be able to express not only their knowledge, but also beliefs and values. Furthermore, individual or collective practices will enable learners to both access information and solve problems, besides making them protagonists of their own lives. Narratives in BNCC appear twice again as abilities expected to be under students’ domains. 1) Analyze and compare different sources and narratives expressed in various languages, with a view to understanding and critiquing philosophical ideas and historical, geographical, political, economic, social, environmental, and cultural processes and events. 2) Identify, analyze, and discuss the historical, geographical political, economic, social, environmental, and cultural circumstances of the emergence of conceptual hegemonic matrices (ethnocentrism, evolution, modernity, etc.), comparing them to narratives that include other agents and discourses. (Brasil, 2018, p. 560, own translation) The abilities described refer to, even if not in such as obvious way, criticality, linguistic and cultural diversity, agency, and discourse. The BNCC orientations signify an advance in terms of multiple issues related to education in Brazil. However, we lack some improvement in aspects concerning linguistic policies and interculturality, among others. TOPIC 2 – LIFE AS NARRATIVE: SELVES Making things personal and bringing them closer to students is what we propose as reflections on the idea of life as narrative. Paraphrasing philosopher René Descartes, we could say: “I narrate, therefore I am”. Bruner (2003), on autobiography and culture, presented two theses. In the first one, he mentions narrative as the most well-succeeded form of telling how one lived. We seem to have no other way of describing "lived time" save in the form of a narrative. Which is not to say that there are not other temporal forms that can be imposed on the experience of time, but none of them succeeds in capturing the sense of lived time: not clock or calendrical time forms, not serial or cyclical orders, not any of these. (Bruner, 2003, p. 692) In the second thesis, the author reflects on relations between life and narrative. He argues that the same way we construct life, we also construct narratives. Moreover, he brings into scene the psychological understanding that what we do is recall memories and interpret facts. 6 The mimesis between life so-called and narrative is a two-way affair: that is to say, just as art imitates life in Aristotle's sense, so, in Oscar Wilde's, life imitates art. Narrative imitates life, life imitates narrative. "Life" in this sense is the same kind of construction of the human imagination as "a narrative" is. It is constructed by human beings through active ratiocination, by the same kind of ratiocination through which we construct narratives. When somebody tells you his life—and that is principally what we shall be talking about—it is always a cognitive achievement rather than a through-the-clear-crystal recital of something univocally given. In the end, it is a narrative achievement. There is no such thing psychologically as "life itself" At very least, it is a selective achievement of memory recall; beyond that, recounting one's life is an interpretive feat. Philosophically speaking, it is hard to imagine being a naive realist about "life itself". (Bruner, 2003, p. 692) According to the author, we select what we want to narrate. It is not every single memory that we narrate. Once again, narratives are purposeful and intended. That is undeniable. We make choices on how we tell our stories. Ely et al. (2007), on the development of the concept of self, describe the aging process of dealing with the sense of self in the Western cultures. There is a general consensus that young children (less than 6 years of age) have an appreciation of the self that is more physical than psychological, often focus on routine activities and momentary moods, and rarely locate the self in a social context. As children move into the school years (6 years and older), the importance of psychological attributes increases. Older children have a sense of self that is embedded in more enduring activities and moods and in a larger social world. Older children are also more likely to be aware of the multidimensional nature of the self. As such, they may be more sensitive to the notion of multiple selves (the varying selves they can be in varying contexts), and possible selves (the selves they might wish to be, or feel they ought to be). (Ely et al., 2007, p. 160) Selves, therefore, are psychological attributes, related to the social contexts one is inserted or temporarily transits through. The older one grows, the more conscious the person becomes of their selves. Bruner (2003, p. 210) claims that “we constantly construct and reconstruct a self to meet the needs of the situations we encounter, and do so with the guidance of our memories of the past and our hopes for the future”. Consonant to that, Guo (2007, p. 182) points out that “the self is one of the most important aspects of one’s identity”. In the theoretical positions concerning self identity, Guo (2007, p. 182) ads that “it is the self-system that provides meaning to people’s experiences”. According to the author, the sense of self (as well as identity) cannot be achieved solely. It happens with the participation of others: “the others may serve as co-producers of self-feeling and self-understanding, as bearers of the standards, as active monitors, or as partners in ongoing internal dialogues” (Guo, 7 2007, p. 182). Bamberg, De Fina and Schiffrin (2007, p. 1), among many views of self, assume the definition of self “as-speaker/narrator”. At the same time, they admit that there are different views of self and that those varied perspectives may cause conflict sometimes. The authors claim that they view self and identity: “not as essential properties of the person but as constituted in talk and particularly in social practice. Moreover, since self and identity are held to be the phenomena that are contextually shaped, they are defined and viewed in the plural, as selves and identities” (Bamberg; De Fina; Schiffrin, 2007, p. 1). In terms of narrative approaches to selves and identities, Bamberg, De Fina and Schiffrin (2007) describe some of the different assumptions which they consider to be fundamental to narrative studies. Their initial point deals with life, biography, and story. While narratives can be said to be just one kind of discourse genre among others, they have moved into the privileged mode for tying together existent analogies between life, biography, and story. And although lives are lived and stories told, and although there is a general openness to lived lives, ‘narrative coherence’ is seen as the guiding post for how lives are actually lived and madesense of in meaningful ways. (Bamberg; De Fina; Schiffrin, 2007, p. 5) Such coherence is essential to the process of making meaning. Otherwise, narratives would probably be bits and pieces rather than life stories, and, therefore, any sense would be lost. The authors state that it is the narrative coherence works as glue. Coherence serves as the structural glue that is added on to life and history, or even the “fabric” with which life is imaginable, enabling to locate a self with a beginning, a middle and an end. While there are different assumptions as to where this glue is “located”, either before the story-telling activity (as an internal, experiential, and basically cognitive, attempt to plot raw events into meaningful patterns) or in the actual act of plotting, i.e., the situated telling of ‘the experience’, narrative is the ordering principle that gives meaning to an otherwise meaningless life. In short, narrative functions as the glue that enables human life to transcend the natural incoherence and discontinuity of the unruly everyday […] by imposing a point of origin and an orientation toward closure, and thereby structuring the otherwise meaningless into a meaningful life. (Bamberg; De Fina; Schiffrin, 2007, p. 5) The authors make a point in saying that narratives bring meaning to our lives. They structure what was once meaningless, what was once incoherent and discontinuous. Through narratives possibilities of establishing origin and closure seem to be infinite. Afterall, we should take narrative as a mode of understanding: 8 our stories and stories of the others. TOPIC 3 – NARRATIVE TO CREATE POWER Distinct projects have multiplied actions on having people working with narratives. While they aim to connect future and narratives to empower people, we propose ourselves to understand how narratives can create a different future and empower people. Narrative Initiative is one of those projects which work with children, focusing mainly on bringing imagination into their creations. Fickes (2020) argues that having this kind of public involved in the project facilitates things, since young children do not have such a long history of precedents in narratives. Young children bring unlimited possibility to stories about their future. Children don’t have narratives bounded by history and precedent. Nor do children have deep political and social narratives defining their view of what’s possible. Simply put – they can access imagination. We find imagination to be both a necessary and strategic component to change. Futures work provides tools for bringing imagination to narrative in productive and tangible ways. (Fickes, 2020) Because children are free of that kind of boundaries in terms of policies and politics, they have the potential to create new narratives for the future. Otherwise, narrative that were created in the past will influence and control power in the present. The author mentions a Transmedia Collage project held in 2017 and 2018, in which teenagers living in Chicago took part in. The project provided them with the freedom, guidance and resources needed to imagine new possible futures. They began by looking at community history. In these histories they found narratives defined by the past and still holding power. These old narratives weren’t just influencing the present. They defined the future’s field of vision. Dominant narratives, the teens discovered, force people into a future based on histories, not imagination. (Fickes, 2020) Key elements mentioned by the author integrated the project, such as freedom, guidance, resources, imagination community history, dominant narratives. Just by looking at and analyzing the stories created in the past, on can build new narratives, and change their future. Past histories cannot define future narratives. What Fickes (2020) proposes is reverse engineering the future, a process which takes some time and investment, but that brings different perspectives on narrative and power. 9 The essence of the process is to first name and describe the future. With that future in our vision we can talk about, write down and even draw the narratives that surround that future. Those narratives describe a history that hasn’t been created – a history that isn’t dependent on today’s dominant narrative and its power. By reverse engineering the future we create new stories. Those stories have people, groups and cultural objects in them. Those stories have a feel. They even have smells and tastes. (Fickes, 2020) Initiative Narrative, according to Fickes (2020) uses a “futures cone” (Voros, 2003) to work with the representations of potentials for future narratives. The reading of the cone (Figure 1) is made starting from the right, with what is possible in the future, contrary to what is probable now, which is on the left. The author justifies: “we use narrative tools give people language to define actions that let us work with the possible, not just the probable” (Fickes, 2020). Figure 1 – Futures cone Source: Fickes, 2020. Adapted from Voros, 2003, p. 16. Squire (2012, p. 69), also about narratives, future, responsibilities, and selves, points out that “understanding narratives as embedded in changing contexts is also a way of conceptualising their placement in relation to the future - and in relation to a responsibility that calls subjects themselves into being”. Only by locating and understanding the selves we can take our responsibilities in changing future narratives. Derrida (2001) also presents meaning within context as relevant in making such changes. A simple phrase takes its meaning from a given context, and already makes its appeal to another one in which it will be understood; but, of course, to be understood it has to transform the context in which it is inscribed. As a result, this appeal, this promise of the future, will necessarily open up the production of a new context, wherever it may happen. The future is not present, but there is an opening onto it; and 10 because there is a future, a context is always open. What we call opening of the context is another name for what is still to come. (Derrida, 2001, p. 19) What the author brings and is of great importance is that even though the future is not now, but we can think of it, plan it, work for it. The idea of opening of context provides primarily certainty that the future can be changed since the very moment we are living now. TOPIC 4 – PEDAGOGICAL PRAXIS: STRATEGIES AND TOOLS The aim in this topic is to introduce possible strategies and tools to work with narratives. As there are countless possibilities, we are presenting some strategies/tools which can help to develop narrative initiatives in varied and multiple contexts, more specifically the pedagogical ones. In meaning to work with narratives, strategies, and tools we are referring to involve mostly sound, image, text, and audiovisual. When it comes to narrating with sound, possibilities are to do it by creating podcasts, web radio or audio-drama. Among these, podcasts have become a popular tool. We are living the so-called Golden Age of podcasting. Depending on the purposes, working with podcasts can be a great strategy. Backtracks (2022) defines a narrative podcast. A narrative podcast is one in which the content creator tells a story over the course of the podcast. This could be simply an audio book reading podcast, or a specific original story, or simply self-narration, such as an autobiographical podcast or “day in the life” style podcast, where the content creator tells stories about events in their life. (Backtracks, 2022, p. 1) Narrative podcasts can be hosted by channels on the internet or by digital streaming services providers. The advantagesof working with narrative podcasts go from low costs to the fact that they are portable. The web radio, also called internet radio, is another alternative. Basically, it is audio service transmitted via internet. Some web radios are connected to traditional radio stations, with simultaneous transmission, while others are independent. Web radio can reach any place around the globe if there is internet access. A third possibility is audio-dramas. Even though some people might say they are like audiobooks, that is no true at all. Audio-dramas are much more than an 11 audio version of a text. Audio-dramas are characterized by dramatization, with a cast of voices and soundtrack music. Narratives with images present a wider range of options: photographs, infographics, illustrations, drawings, comics, and memes. Photographs have been used for over a century to tell stories. It all started with illustrations and drawings, which are still around, but photographs took the visual arts to another level. Taking photos of people, places, and objects has helped us to create and tell stories about the most diverse themes. More recently infographics have also got their space in narration. Huffpost (2017) explain how the process of working with infographics works. The best infographics are created when a story comes first. In a completed piece, every data point, piece of copy, and design element should support the story. This does not mean, however, that the story an individual or organization wants to tell will intuitively translate to the infographic medium. (Huffpost, 2017, p. 1) That way the story comes before the infographic creation, but it does not mean at all that transporting the narrative to the infographic is an easy task. It happens that the narrative elements are not always available on infographics. Such medium can be used, for instance, in presenting research data. Comics, or comic books, is a medium which combines text and other visual information to express ideas and tell stories. Comics are formed by juxtaposing sequences of panels with images. Among comics we also find graphic novels, comic strips (Image 1), cartoons (Image 2), caricatures (Image 3), and so on. Image 1 – Comic strip Credit: humphrey/Shutterstock. 12 Image 2 – Cartoon Credit: Ellagrin/Shutterstock. Image 3 – Caricature Credit: thongyhod/Shutterstock. 13 However, in terms of images, there is not any other more popular nowadays than memes (Image 4). Meme is “and idea, image, video, etc. that is spread very quickly on the internet” (Meme, 2022). Image 4 – Meme Credit: Tupungato/Shutterstock. When it comes to text, the most well-known tools are blogs, hypertexts, E- zines, and fanfics. A blog is more likely an online journal. Hypertexts are methods of organizing information, such as words, sentences, pages, articles, chapters, books, and libraries. It works with a linkage system. E-zines are electronic magazines, which sometimes are simply the traditional magazine transported to the online world. Fanfics (also called fan fictions) are “stories written about TV, film or book characters by their fans (people who admire them), or an example of such a story” (Fanfic, 2022). Finally, we have the audiovisual possibilities of working with narratives. Among them are documentaries, interactive videos, animation videos, and video- minute. While documentary is a non-fictional film, the others are shorter productions. All of them with the purpose of narrating something. 14 There is other several possibilities of working with narratives, mainly on social media and by making use of apps. It is just a matter of thinking of a strategy and finding a proper tool to narrate whatever one feels like saying or showing. Narratives do not need to be in one format or mode only. They can and should be diverse, multimodal, and meaning making, changing lives, and opening new horizons, contemplating people of all ages and lifestyles, anywhere around the globe, at any time. TOPIC 5 – FINAL THOUGHTS At this point, we are summarizing the main ideas developed through the course. We started our journey by addressing narratives as a contextual and interdisciplinary theory and the inseparability between form and ideology (or form and content). Then, we discussed the cultural aspects of narratives, as well as multiple identities and contexts, together with discursive ideologies involving narratives. After that, we focused on locus of enunciation and on being and acting in society as social actors, including the role of emotions in our narratives. We also contemplated interrelated modes and ethics in narrating our stories and the stories of the others. At the next point we reflected on languaging, language as discourse, multilingual and plurilingual contexts. Besides that, we investigated translingual practices and the development of language through narratives. We continued working on language, but this time together with literature and cinema, seeing concepts of verbality and iconicity, and adaption to cinema and literature. What is more, we revisited elements which compose narratives and discussed the narrative genre. Following our journey we saw narratives from different times, the main aspects of art and AI in narratives, and the role of authorship. Furthermore, we discussed criticality within narratives and the role of interculturality in narratology. Finally, we had a glance into the future of narratology. Along with that, we discussed narratives in relation to educational contexts, and life as narrative. Yet, looking into the future, we speculated on how to create a different future and empower people. Then, seeing possibilities of strategies and tools to work with narratives was our closing topic. 15 Now that we are about finishing this journey, it is fair enough to go back to that initial reflection on writing about narratives, which could be seen as a challenge or a privilege. It was undoubtedly a challenge! But on the other hand, what a great opportunity not only to share, but also to learn, while researching, reading, and preparing the lessons. Reflecting on our own narratives and practices, viewing possibilities of making things differently and renovating our faith in that education is the most powerful tool we have at our disposal. What is left is the certainty that not everything about narratives was contemplated in these lessons. There is room for much more. One aspect that permeated the whole journey and which without it this course would not have happened is the human aspect in and of narratives. Making ourselves available to read, listen to, hear, and watch each other’s stories can teach and bring us closer than ever. And so, we come to the end of our own narrative, created, and written according to our perspectives and identities, based on our cultures and experiences. There is the quote by Jonathan Gottschall (2012, p. 13), which says: “We are, as a species, addicted to story. Even when the body goes to sleep, the mind stays up all night, telling itself stories.” Hopefully, we keep telling stories, in life and in our dreams. If there is nothing left, remember: you have your story to tell. A story which is at the same time unique and with lots in common with so many other stories. To keep in mind: stories have two sides. The ones you tell and those you hear. 16 REFERENCES AMON, B. T. Transmedia Narratives in Education: The Potentials of Multisensory Emotional Arousal in Teaching and Learning Contexts. ntech pen, 2020, p. 1-26. BACKTRACKS. arrative odcast. Available at: . Accessed: 6 September 2022. BAMBERG, M.; DE FINA, A.; SCHIFFRIN, D. elves and dentitiesin arrative and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007. BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. ase acional Comum Curricular. Brasília, 2018. BRUNER, J. Self-making narratives. In: FIVUSH, R.; HADEN, C. (Eds.). utobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. _______. Life as Narrative. ocial esearch, v. 71, n. 3, p. 691-710, 2004. DERRIDA, J. aste for the ecret. London: Polity, 2001. ELY, R. et al. I beat them all up Self-representation in young children’s personal narratives. In: BAMBERG, M.; DE FINA, A.; SCHIFFRIN, D. elves and dentities in arrative and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007. FANFIC. In: Cambridge Dictionary. Available at: . Accessed: 6 September 2022. FICKES, T. Our futures now: Turning imagination into narrative power. arrative nitiative. 2020. Available at: . Accessed: 6 September 2022. GOTTSCHALL, J. he torytelling nimal: How Stories Make Us Human. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012. GUO, J. Multiple selves and thematic domains in gender identity: perspectives from Chinese children’s conflict management styles. In: BAMBERG, M.; DE FINA, A.; SCHIFFRIN, D. elves and dentities in arrative and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007. 17 HUFFPOST. Crafting an nfographic arrative. 2017. Available at: . Accessed: 6 September 2022. MEME. In: Cambridge Dictionary. Available at: . Accessed: 6 September 2022. SQUIRE, C. Narratives and the gift of the future. arrative orks: ssues, nvestigations, & nterventions, v. 2, n. 1, p. 67-82, 2012. VAN DER MIEROOP, D.; CLIFTON, J.; SCHNURR, S. Narratives as social practice in organisational contexts. arrative nquiry, v. 32, n. 1, p 1-8, 2022.