Prévia do material em texto
Global burden of cardiovasc Original Article ular diseases attributable to hypertension in young adults from1990 to 2019 Jing Liua,d, Xiang Bub, Linyan Weia,d, Xiqiang Wanga,d, Lulu Laic, Caijuan Donga,d, Aiqun Maa,d, and Tingzhong Wanga,d Journal of Hypertension 2021, 39:2488–2496 aDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, bDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, cCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Washington University School of Medi- cine in Saint Louis, Missouri, USA and dKey Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, Shaanxi Province, China Correspondence to Aiqun Ma, Tingzhong Wang, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 277 Yanta West Road, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi, P.R. China. E-mail: tingzhong.wang@xjtu.edu.cn, aiqun.ma@xjtu.edu.cn Received 20 April 2021 Revised 5 June 2021 Accepted 25 June 2021 J Hypertens 39:2488–2496 Copyright � 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY- NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without Background: Hypertension grows into a serious public health problem among young adults, linking to a set of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Young adults are not well represented in current knowledge about the CVDs burden attributable to hypertension. Methods: In this analysis of data from the GBD (Global Burden of Disease) study 2019, we focus on young adults and provide the first comprehensive and comparative assessment of the hypertension attributable CVDs burden, in terms of its mortality and years of living with disability (YLD) from 1990 to 2019, stratified by location, sex, and development status. Results: Globally in 2019, the death and YLD numbers caused by hypertension-related CVDs were 640 239 and 2 717 474 in young adults, marking a 43.0 and 86.6% increase from 1990, respectively. The corresponding mortality rate dropped by 10.5%, whereas the YLD rate increased by 16.8% during the same period. V-shaped association between CVDs burden and social development status was observed. The largest burden and the most pronounced increase were borne by middle-income countries, while high-income countries had the lowest death/YLD rate with a quicker annual decline. Men largely outpaced women in hypertension attributable CVDs mortality. Ischemic heart disease and stroke were the leading cause for death and YLD burden, correspondingly. Conclusions: Hypertension attributable CVDs burden in young adults has greatly increased from 1990 to 2019, with considerably spatiotemporal and sexual heterogeneity. The largest burden was borne by middle-income countries, especially by men. Establishment of geographically and sexually tailored strategies were needed to prevent hypertension-related CVDs in young adults. Keywords: cardiovascular diseases, global disease burden 2019, hypertension, young adults Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; BRIC, Brazil, Russia, India, and China; CI, confidence interval; CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; EAPC, estimated annual percentage change; ESBP, elevated systolic blood pressure; GBD, Global Burden of Diseases; HHD, hypertensive heart disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease; IHME, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation; SDI, social-demographic index; YLD, years lived with disability 2488 www.jhypertension.com INTRODUCTION H ypertension is a complex condition associated with multiple cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and it is progressively advanced to a major risk factor for young individuals [1]. In 2013–2014, unadjusted hyperten- sion prevalence was nearly 20% in American adults aged 18–49 years [2]. Previous studies have shown that young adult exposure to systolic blood pressure (SBP) �130 mmHg had significantly higher risk for subsequent cardiovascular events compared to those with normal BP [3], and a graded increase in adverse cardiovascular out- comes with BP severity was observed among 4.5 million young adults [4]. Even adults with SBP of 120–129 mmHg before age 40 years had adjusted risk ratio of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–2.77) for CVDs in later life compared to those with normal BP before age 40 years [5]. The CVDs burden and economy loss due to early onset and uncontrolled status of hypertension in young adults is worrisome. Nevertheless, most studies of hypertension appear to segregate among higher-risk individuals (fre- quently older than 50 years). CVDs burden attributable to elevated SBP (ESBP) in young adulthood, a vulnerable period and crucial window for adult health determination [5], is not well represented in current knowledge [6]. This study aimed to explore the current condition and temporal trends of fatal and nonfatal burden of CVDs attributable to ESBP in young adults, stratified by location, sex, and development status. permission from the journal. DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002958 Volume 39 � Number 12 � December 2021 mailto:tingzhong.wang@xjtu.edu.cn mailto:aiqun.ma@xjtu.edu.cn Hypertension burden in young adults METHODS Patient and public involvement Our study was based on Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Study 2019 [7,8]. A waiver of informed consent is reviewed and approved by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) review board at the University of Wash- ington. No individual subjects were involved in this study. Study design and data source All anonymized data were publicly accessible at the website of Global Health Data Exchange (http://ghdx.healthda- ta.org/gbd-results-tool). The general methods for the estab- lishment of GBD 2019 and the methods for estimation of ESBP-related CVDs burden have been detailed in previous studies [9,10]. The social-demographic index (SDI) data by locations were obtained from the IHME website (http:// ghdx.healthdata.org/) and were displayed in Tables S1 and S2, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/ HJH/B725. Framework and definition According to the GBD 2015 comparative risk assessment study [10], ESBP was defined as the SBP of at least 110– 115 mmHg, a level that is associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke [11]. ‘Young adults’ was defined as people aged 25–49, who are gener- ally in the peak period of physical performance and form the main labor force of society. Two metrics, death and years of living with disability (YLD), were used to assess the fatal and nonfatal burden. Regions were arranged into three nested hierarchical levels: 204 countries and territories, 21 FIGURE 1 The global ESBP-related CVDs burden in young adults in 2019, by 204 countr (c and d) of death and YLD in 204 countries and territories. Countries with top ranking elevated systolic blood pressure; YLD, years lived with disability. Journal of Hypertension GBD World Regions and SDI quintiles (high, high-middle, middle, low-middle, and low-SDI). Statistical analysis We used the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and its 95% CI to quantify the temporal trends. Smoothing splines model was fitted to assess the association between EAPCs and SDI [12,13]. EAPC is computed by a well estab- lished formula [14], and an EAPC of 0, positive or negative value indicates that rates are stable, in a downward or upward trend over time, respectively, and the greater the absolute value of EAPC, the faster the rate changes over time. SDI, ranging from 0 (worst) to 1 (best), is a statistic composite index of the total fertility rate of population under 25 years of age, average education level for adults, and lag-distributed income per capita indicator [15]. R program (Version 3.6.3; R core team) was used to perform statistics and map the figures. The PGlobal burden in 2019 Globally in 2019, a total number of 640 240 deaths and 2 717 475 YLDs were caused by ESBP-related CVDs in young adults. The countries with the highest absolute burden were India (death: 136 029, YLD: 363 631) and China (death: 107 420, YLD: 623 628). Pakistan, Russian Federation, Brazil, and the United states were all on the list of the most burdened countries (Fig. 1a and b). The corresponding rates of death and YLD were 23.6 and 100.0 per 100 000 population, respectively. Countries with top ranking death ies and territories. The absolute numbers (a and b) and rates (per 100 000 persons) number and rate were annotated in the map. CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; ESBP, www.jhypertension.com 2489 http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool http://ghdx.healthdata.org/ http://ghdx.healthdata.org/ http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 Liu et al. rates were mainly in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia (Fig. 1c), and the highest record of death rate and YLDs rate were observed in Mongolia (69.8 per 100 000) and Indonesia (249.2 per 100 000), respectively (Fig. 1d). Apparently, as a country with large population base, Indonesia will suffer a heavy and surging absolute burden in the near future. After zooming out to GBD region level, Australia, Southern Latin America, and Andean Latin America clearly outperformed on the control of ESBP- related CVDs compared to other regions with similar devel- opment status (Figure S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725, Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725). Relative change over time From 1990 to 2019, the change of CVDs death number in young adults with ESBP was spatially heterogeneous. Broadly, countries in Western and Central Europe had the most significant decline, and South Korea, Finland, and Hungary were the top three countries that had fallen furthest. The largest increases (>200% rise) were observed in countries including Philippines, Pakistan, Libya, Uzbek, etc. (Figure S2A, Supplemental Digital Content, http://link- s.lww.com/HJH/B725). During the same period, YLD num- ber showed sharp growth larger than 50% across the whole Asia, Africa, and Latin America, but slight decline in South Korea, Japan, and countries in Western and Central Europe (Figure S2B, Supplemental Digital Content, http://link- s.lww.com/HJH/B725). The mortality rates of ESBP-related CVDs in young adults decreased across the world except for several Asia and Africa countries, including Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, Libya, etc. (Fig. 2a). High-income Asia Pacific countries had the largest decrease with an EAPC of �3.50 (�3.77, �3.22; Table 1). Conversely, the YLD rates increased globally and the descending trend was exclusively observed in High-SDI quintile (Fig. 2b and c), including High-income Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Australasia, Tropical Latin America, etc. (Table 1). And the largest decrease were observed in female population living in high-income Asia Pacific (EAPC¼ �2.15 [–2.69, –1.62]) (Fig. 2c). Disparities across social-demographic index quintiles Among SDI quintiles, the global ESBP-related CVDs burden in young adults varied dramatically. In 2019, one third of the death and YLD numbers were contributed by Middle-SDI quintile (death: 218 595.4, YLDs: 971 832.6) (Fig. 3a). Also, the leading death rate and YLDs rate were observed in Low- middle (29.5 per 100 000) and Middle (108.5 per 100 000) SDI quintiles (Fig. 3b). High-SDI quintile was the least burdened and displayed a downward trend for both death and YLD rates over the past decades. Proportion and relative distribution by cause Globally in 2019, ninety percentage of ESBP-related CVDs deaths in young adults were due to ischemic heart disease (IHD, 320 142.5), stroke (220 538.1) and hypertensive heart disease (HHD, 49 327.1) (Table 2). High-income North 2490 www.jhypertension.com America had a much larger proportion of HHD death comparing other very developed regions (Figure S3A, Sup- plemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/ B725). The annual mortality rates for IHD, stroke and HHD declined globally. High-SDI quintile had the rapidest reduction of IHD (EAPC: �2.11 [–2.28, –1.94]) and stroke (EAPC: –2.38 [–2.55, –2.20]) but a sharp and exclusive increase of HHD (EAPC: 1.81 [1.58, 2.04]). In the terms of YLDs, stroke was the main contributor with 1 684 328.6 global number. The proportion of rheumatic heart disease pumped out obviously in developing regions, as did the proportion of atrial fibrillation and flutter in developed regions. The YLDs rates of IHD, stroke and HHD increased globally except that high-SDI quintile had obvious decrease for YLD rate of IHD. Sex heterogeneity Typical sex difference existed in ESBP-related CVDs death among young adults. Male had much higher death num- bers and rates than female globally and regionally (Figs. 3 and Fig. 4a, Figure S4A and B, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725), as well as in different age stratifications (Fig. 4b). Also, the ratio of IHC- specific to entire CVDs deaths is much higher in male (54.20%) than that in female (40.48%) (Table 2). The most significant sex difference occurred in Russian Federation, where the death rate of men was almost five times that of women (Figure S4A and B, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725). Some other notable patterns were observed in middle- and low-middle regions SDI, including South Asia, East Asia and Southeast Asia, where the mortality rate increased consistently on a higher base for male while decreased further on a lower base for female (Figs. 2c and Fig. 4a). In addition, female experienced much quicker declines on the global death rates caused by IHD, stroke and HHD than male (Figure S5A, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/ HJH/B725). No obvious sex difference was observed for YLDs numbers and rates, but the annual increases of YLDs rates for male outnumbered that in female across SDI quintiles. The relationship between burden and social- demographic index Generally, death rates of ESBP-related CVDs in young adults by 21 GBD World Regions decreased with increasing SDI (Fig. 4c). Eastern Europe, Central Asia and Oceania had much higher death rates than expected based on SDI for all years, and the death rates showed a sharp increase followed by a rapid decline during 1990–2019. Conversely, an increase in YLD rate was observed in most GBD World Regions despite gains in SDI over time, and the YLDs rate in different regions varied much larger than the death rates (Fig. 4d). Taken as a whole, an asymmetrically inverted V- shaped correlation was detected between SDI and death/ YLD rates, and the fitting curves reached the peak as SDI was near 0.7. Also, the EAPCs of death/YLD rates in 204 countries and territories showed similar associations with SDI in 2019 (Figure S5C and D, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725). Volume 39 � Number 12 � December 2021 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 http://links.lww.com/HJH/B725 FIGURE 2 The annual variation of ESBP-related CVDs burden in young adults from 1990 to 2019, by location. EAPCs of death/YLD rates (per 100 000 persons) in 204 countries/territories (a and b), and in SDI quintiles and 21 GBD World Regions, by sex (c). EAPC, estimated annual percentage changes; GBD, Global Burden of Disease; SDI, social-demographic index; other abbreviations as in Fig. 1. Hypertension burden in young adults Journal of Hypertension www.jhypertension.com 2491 TABLE 1. The temporal trend of ESBP-related CVDs burden (deathand YLD) in young adults from 1990 to 2019, by location and development status GBD World Regions Death EAPCs YLD EAPCs Global –0.44 (–0.57, –0.32) 0.59 (0.55, 0.63) High SDI –1.76 (–1.90, –1.62) –0.11 (–0.27, 0.05) High-middle SDI –1.41 (–1.82, –0.99) 0.46 (0.32, 0.60) Middle SDI –0.06 (–0.18, 0.06) 0.88 (0.83, 0.92) Low-middle SDI –0.07 (–0.17, 0.04) 0.62 (0.56, 0.67) Low SDI –0.51 (–0.54, –0.47) 0.56 (0.48, 0.64) High-income Asia Pacific –3.50 (–3.77, –3.22) –1.26 (–1.68, –0.84) Central Asia –0.47 (–1.11, 0.17) 0.27 (0.16, 0.38) East Asia –0.02 (–0.23, 0.18) 1.40 (1.30, 1.51) South Asia –0.06 (–0.23, 0.10) 0.30 (0.24, 0.36) Southeast Asia 0.53 (0.36, 0.71) 0.71 (0.65, 0.77) Australasia –2.55 (–2.70, –2.40) –0.26 (–0.35, –0.17) Caribbean 0.35 (0.10, 0.60) 0.87 (0.81, 0.94) Central Europe –3.41 (–3.71, –3.10) –0.52 (–0.61, –0.42) Eastern Europe –0.77 (–1.72, 0.18) 0.10 (–0.19, 0.40) Western Europe –3.13 (–3.23, –3.02) –0.62 (–0.74, –0.51) Andean Latin America –0.58 (–0.97, –0.18) 1.77 (1.37, 2.18) Central Latin America –0.88 (–1.16, –0.60) 0.26 (0.09, 0.44) Southern Latin America –1.86 (–1.99, –1.73) 1.17 (1.07, 1.27) Tropical Latin America –2.37 (–2.43, –2.30) –0.33 (–0.39, –0.26) High-income North America –0.69 (–0.90, –0.48) 0.67 (0.45, 0.89) North Africa and Middle East –1.32 (–1.40, –1.23) 0.30 (0.26, 0.35) Oceania 1.18 (0.93, 1.42) 1.45 (1.19, 1.71) Central Sub-Saharan Africa –1.15 (–1.29, –1.00) –0.59 (–0.70, –0.49) Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa –1.08 (–1.21, –0.94) 0.67 (0.58, 0.76) Southern Sub-Saharan Africa –2.20 (–2.72, –1.68) –0.33 (–0.42, –0.23) Western Sub-Saharan Africa 0.00 (–0.17, 0.16) 1.39 (1.25, 1.53) CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; ESBP, elevated systolic blood pressure; SDI, social- demographic index; YLD, years lived with disability. Liu et al. DISCUSSION A globally increasing burden of ESBP-related CVDs, both fatal and nonfatal, was borne by young adults over the years. The global deaths and YLDs number in 2019 were 640 239.6 and 2 717 474.7, marking a 43.0 and 86.6% increase from 1990, respectively. With the annual increase in SDI, the global death rate gradually declined while the YLDs rates showed a rapid increase during the same period. Substantive discrepancies existed in the ESBP-related CVD burden across SDI quintiles and between sex groups. The largest absolute burden and most pronounced increases of YLD rates were observed in middle-SDI quintile. High-SDI quintile had the lowest burden and showed an exclusively downward trend for death number and YLD rate compared to other SDI quintiles. Young men had largely outpaced women in absolute fatal burden, with a much higher global mortality rate than that of their female counterpart in 2019. Overall, these results demonstrated the importance of increased investment in prevention and treatment of ESBP-related CVD for young adults across the world, espe- cially for men in middle-SDI countries. Geographical transition As is well known, ESBP-related CVDs were once recog- nized as the diseases of affluence due to its high prevalence and heavy burden in affluent societies. It was reported to be the leading cause of death for both men and women, leading to one in four premature deaths in United States 2492 www.jhypertension.com in 2009 [16]. However, ESBP-related CVDs in young people were currently global and were undergoing a geo-specific transition to middle-income countries. Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC) are emerging economies making up almost half the global population [17]. They reiterated the commitment to control non–communicable diseases including CVDs in 2014 and made some efforts on the reduction in premature CVD mortality after that [18–20]. Whereas, our analysis showed a depressing picture about the current situation of ESBP-related CVD burden among young adults in BRIC. In 2013, the United Nations (UN) adopted measures of lowering behavioral and biological risk to achieve the 25% reduction in CVDs mortality by 2025 [21]. Obviously, the work priority should be given to the BRIC, especially Russia Federation, due to their heavy burden, as well as their increasing global significance both as individual countries and as an economic grouping. In addition, as one of the countries with the heaviest absolute burden, Indonesia had a very high and annually increasing death/YLD rate. The BP control and concomitant CVDs treatment in young adults could be an important public health challenge for Indonesian government and health department. Considering the fact that Indonesia is one of the developing countries which have been experiencing population increase and infectious diseases [22–24], more attention and support from UN should be helpful. Change trends related to social-demographic index The asymmetrically inverted V-shaped correlation between SDI and death/YLDs rates, as well as the EAPCs, indicated that countries in the middle-SDI quintile were bearing the heaviest and increasing burden, and this situation was the past of high-SDI regions but the near future of low-SDI regions. Interpretation of this correlation needed to con- sider some change drivers as follows. Some metabolic and behavioral risk factors, including diabetes, obesity, tobacco use and sedentary lifestyle, tend to increase with develop- ment [25–29]. More importantly, attention to dietary struc- ture and physical health, well established medical systems, and popularization of low-cost treatment show the same trend. This explains the current low burden in low-SDI regions and the greatly reduced burden in high-SDI regions. Countries sitting in the middle stage of develop- ment face an awkward situation, the epidemic risk factors, weak disease awareness and limited health funds invest- ment largely aggravate young adults’ vulnerability to ESBP- related CVDs. Large-scale hypertension screening cam- paigns in young adults are highly recommended for mid- dle-income countries. Sex preponderance Sex preponderance existed undoubtedly in CVDs [30], and our data re-established the notion that young women were relatively protected from ESBP-related CVDs compared with men. This result was consistent to a pooled study in 2015 that analyzed data from 844 studies performed in 154 countries, estimating a 5mmHg lower global mean age-standardized systolic BP in women than in men (122.3mmHg vs. 127mmHg) [11]. In both high- and middle-income countries, Volume 39 � Number 12 � December 2021 TABLE 2. Global numbers and proportion of ESBP-related CVDs burden (death and YLD) for 11 causes, by sex, in 2019 Both sexes Female Male Cause Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Death Ischemic heart disease 320142.5 50.00% 79212.0 40.48% 240930.5 54.20% Stroke 220538.1 34.45% 76981.4 39.34% 143556.7 32.29% Hypertensive heart disease 49327.1 7.70% 21338.7 10.90% 27988.5 6.30% Rheumatic heart disease 15618.1 2.44% 7591.0 3.88% 8027.1 1.81% Cardiomyopathy and myocarditis 12027.4 1.88% 2991.0 1.53% 9036.4 2.03% Endocarditis 4054.9 0.63% 1215.5 0.62% 2839.4 0.64% Aortic aneurysm 4045.8 0.63% 869.3 0.44% 3176.5 0.71% Nonrheumatic valvar heart disease 1647.2 a0.26% 419.9 0.21% 1227.3 0.28% Atrial fibrillation and flutter 878.8 0.14% 372.2 0.19% 506.6 0.11% Peripheral arterial disease 139.4 0.02% 36.2 0.02% 103.2 0.02% Other CVDs 11820.2 1.85% 4669.8 2.39% 7150.5 1.61% YLD Stroke 1684328.6 61.98% 877748.3 64.40% 806580.3 59.55% Rheumatic heart disease 287450.4 10.58% 139598.1 10.24% 147852.2 10.92% Ischemic heart disease 274661.5 10.11% 99515.5 7.30% 175145.9 12.93% Hypertensive heart disease 97891.1 3.60% 42160.5 3.09% 55730.6 4.11% Atrial fibrillation and flutter 81576.5 3.00% 29068.7 2.13% 52507.8 3.88% Cardiomyopathy and myocarditis 10368.7 0.38% 3111.8 0.23% 7256.9 0.54% Endocarditis 894.1 0.03% 354.6 0.03% 539.5 0.04% Nonrheumatic valvar heart disease 580.4 0.02% 130.0 0.01% 450.5 0.03% Peripheral arterial disease 54.6 0.00% 34.3 0.00% 20.3 0.00% Other CVDs 279668.8 10.29% 171330.9 12.57% 108337.9 8.00% CVDs,cardiovascular diseases; ESBP, elevated systolic blood pressure; YLD, years lived with disability. FIGURE 3 The changing trends of ESBP-related CVDs in young adults during 1990–2019, by sex and SDI quintiles. The changing trend of death/YLD numbers (a) and rates (b) in SDI quintiles, by sex. Abbreviations as in Figs. 1 and 2. Hypertension burden in young adults Journal of Hypertension www.jhypertension.com 2493 FIGURE 4 The sexual and socioeconomic disparities of ESBP-related CVDs burden in young adults. (a) Death/YLD rates in 21 GBD world regions, by sex, in 1990 and 2019. (b) Global numbers and rates of death/YLD in different age stratifications, by sex, in 2019. (c and d) Trends in death/YLD rates across 21 GBD world regions by SDI, 1990– 2019. Each colored point line represents the rates for each year from 1990 to 2019 in a specified region. The blue line shows estimate across the spectrum of the SDI. Abbreviations as in Figs. 1 and 2. Liu et al. women have higher proportions of hypertension awareness, treatment and control than men [31]. Also, men have a more unfavorable CVDs risk factor profile [32], and the disparities in behavioral and metabolic risk factors largely drive the sex difference in hypertension and CVDs [33]. The huge sex difference in mortality we observed in Russia Federation, a country with severe alcoholic problem in men [34], illus- trated the point well. Also, men’s higher ratio of IHC-specific to entire CVDs deaths in our study was consistent with the report that women have less prior myocardial infarction and less extensive epicardial coronary artery disease compared with men [35]. This clinically meaningful sex difference requires increased awareness to adopt sex-specific BP con- trol, and to improve the prevention and treatment of hyper- tension and its concomitant CVDs in young men. In addition, inherent sex heterogeneity, for example, the estrogen, could contribute to this sex difference in young adults [36], a more detailed understanding of its underlying mechanism in CVDs might shed light into the design of new drugs targeting sex-specific cardiovascular mechanisms and affecting phenotypes. 2494 www.jhypertension.com Public health implications HSBP-attributable CVDs are highly preventable, and timely intervention significantly improves outcomes. From a pub- lic health perspective, shifting the distribution curve of hypertension to the right by a small amount on the entire population age axis can have a considerable effect on disease burden, the overall benefit from emphasizing the primary prevention of hypertension in young adults is likely to exceed that from treating patients with hypertension- related CVDs [37]. Our study improved the understanding about levels and trends of the CVDs burden among young adults, helped to appropriately guide efforts of improving cardiovascular health in early stage at macro geographical scale. Highlights of this study Comparing to old-age population, the full story of ESBP- related CVDs in young adults is more nuanced and hetero- geneous, indicating a notably broader range of character- istics. In our study, the comprehensive and comparable Volume 39 � Number 12 � December 2021 Hypertension burden in young adults assessment focusing on young adults made a good effort to quantify levels and trends of the fatal and nonfatal burden, and offered insights into past policy successes and highlighted the current priorities for the control of hyper- tension and concomitant CVDs. Study limitations There were some inherent limitations in this study. Firstly, the quality of our analysis largely depended on the quality of initial GBD studies providing hypertension data, the sparse data in low-SDI quintile could lead to inaccuracies in summary analysis. Secondly, due to the limitation of GBD data, effects from factors related to ESBP (e.g. high low- density lipoprotein cholesterol), whether directly or indi- rectly, was incorporated when aggregating the CVDs bur- den attributable to ESBP. Thirdly, data on the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension were not collected in GBD database. In conclusion, the hypertension-related CVDs burden was increasing largely among young adults, with a consid- erable spatiotemporal and sexual heterogeneity. The total burden was undergoing a geo-specific transition from high- SDI regions to middle-SDI regions. Male had largely out- paced female in terms of fatal burden. The deteriorating balance in CVDs burden demonstrated the importance of increasing investment in cardiovascular health of young adults, especially the male population in middle income countries. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Availability of data and materials: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GBD database, (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd- results-tool). Funding: No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. Authors’ contributions: J.L. performed the data curation and wrote the manuscript. X.B. and X.Q.W. was responsible for software and data visualization. C.J.D. completed the tables. L.Y.W. and L.L.L. was in charge of literatures retrieval and arrangement. A.Q.M. planned the study. T.Z.W. guided and revised this paper. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388:1659–1724. 2. Zhang Y, Moran AE. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among young adults in the United States, 1999 to 2014. Hypertension 2017; 70:736–742. 3. Zhang Y, Vittinghoff E, Pletcher MJ, Allen NB, Zeki AHA, Yaffe K. Associations of blood pressure and cholesterol levels during young adulthood with later cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:330–341. Journal of Hypertension 4. Luo D, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Ba M, Chen P, Li H, et al. Association between high blood pressure and long term cardiovascular events in young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 370:m3222. 5. Yano Y, Reis JP, Colangelo LA, Shimbo D, Viera AJ, Allen NB, et al. Association of blood pressure classification in young adults using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline with cardiovascular events later in life. JAMA 2018; 320:1774–1782. 6. De Venecia T, Lu M, Figueredo VM. Hypertension in young adults. Postgrad Med 2016; 128:201–207. 7. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990– 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2020; 395:709–733. 8. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395:200–211. 9. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1923–1994. 10. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115mmHg, 1990–2015. JAMA 2017; 317:165–182. 11. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19.1 million participants. Lancet 2017; 389:37–55. 12. Suk HW, West SG, Fine KL, Grimm KJ. Nonlinear growth curve modeling using penalized spline models: a gentle introduction. PsycholMethods 2019; 24:269–290. 13. Perperoglou A, Sauerbrei W, Abrahamowicz M, Schmid M. A review of spline function procedures in R. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:46. 14. Tan CS, Støer N, Ning Y, Chen Y, Reilly M. Quantifying temporal trends of age-standardized rates with odds. Popul Health Metr 2018; 16:18. 15. GBD 2017 Population and Fertility Collaborators. Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1995–2051. 16. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123:e18–e209. 17. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1736–1788. 18. Harmer A, Fleck F. The BRICS countries: a new force in global health? Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92:394–395. 19. Ribeiro AL, Duncan BB, Brant LC, Lotufo PA, Mill JG, Barreto SM. Cardiovascular health in Brazil: trends and perspectives. Circulation 2016; 133:422–433. 20. Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovas- cular disease in China: current features and implications. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019; 16:203–212. 21. World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2013. Available at: https:// www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-action-plan/en/. Accessed November 5, 2019. 22. Hogerzeil HV, Liberman J, Wirtz VJ, Kishore SP, Selvaraj S, Kiddell- Monroe R, et al. Promotion of access to essential medicines for non- communicable diseases: practical implications of the UN political declaration. Lancet 2013; 381:680–689. 23. Remais JV, Zeng G, Li G, Tian L, Engelgau MM. Convergence of noncommunicable and infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42:221–227. 24. Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus ME, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, et al. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally repre- sentative individual-level data from 1.1 million adults. Lancet 2019; 394:652–662. www.jhypertension.com 2495 http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-action-plan/en/ https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-action-plan/en/ Liu et al. 25. Tzoulaki I, Elliott P, Kontis V, Ezzati M. Worldwide exposures to cardiovascular risk factors and associated health effects: current knowl- edge and data gaps. Circulation 2016; 133:2314–2333. 26. Bellettiere J, LaMonte MJ, Evenson KR, Rillamas-Sun E, Kerr J, Lee IM, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease in older women: the Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) study. Circulation 2019; 139:1036–1046. 27. Liu G, Li Y, Hu Y, Zong G, Li S, Rimm EB, et al. Influence of lifestyle on incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:2867–2876. 28. Pazoki R, Dehghan A, Evangelou E, Warren H, Gao H, Caulfield M, et al. Genetic predisposition to high blood pressure and lifestyle factors: associations with midlife blood pressure levels and cardiovas- cular events. Circulation 2018; 137:653–661. 29. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. 30. Boggia J, Thijs L, Hansen TW, Li Y, Kikuya M, Björklund-Bodegård K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 9357 subjects from 11 populations highlights missed opportunities for cardiovascular pre- vention in women. Hypertension 2011; 57:397–405. 2496 www.jhypertension.com 31. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020; 16:223–237. 32. Banks E, Welsh J, Joshy G, Martin M, Paige E, Korda RJ. Comparison of cardiovascular disease risk factors, assessment and management in men and women, including consideration of absolute risk: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e038761. 33. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, et al. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 2016; 134:441–450. 34. Zaridze D, Lewington S, Boroda A, Scélo G, Karpov R, Lazarev A, et al. Alcohol and mortality in Russia: prospective observational study of 151,000 adults. Lancet 2014; 383:1465–1473. 35. Mendirichaga R, Jacobs AK. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease— the paradox persists. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5:754–756. 36. Aryan L, Younessi D, Zargari M, Banerjee S, Agopian J, Rahman S, et al. The role of estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:. 37. Jafar TH, Hatcher J, Poulter N, Islam M, Hashmi S, Qadri Z, et al. Community-based interventions to promote blood pressure control in a developing country: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:593–601. Volume 39 � Number 12 � December 2021 REFERENCES