Prévia do material em texto
ARTICLE Predicting Escalated Care in Infants With Bronchiolitis Gabrielle Freire, MD, FRCP(C), a Nathan Kuppermann, MD, MPH, b Roger Zemek, MD, FRCP(C), c Amy C. Plint, MD, FRCP(C), MSc, c Franz E. Babl, MD, MPH, d, e Stuart R. Dalziel, MBChB, FRACP, PhD, f Stephen B. Freedman, MDCM, MSc, FRCP(C), g Eshetu G. Atenafu, MSc, h Derek Stephens, MSc, i Dale W. Steele, MD, MSc, j Ricardo M. Fernandes, MD, PhD, k Todd A. Florin, MD, MSCE, l Anupam Kharbanda, MD, MSc, m Mark D. Lyttle, MBChB, n David W. Johnson, MD, o David Schnadower, MD, p Charles G. Macias, MD, q Javier Benito, MD, PhD, r Suzanne Schuh, MD, FRCP(C), a, i for the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early risk stratification of infants with bronchiolitis receiving airway support is critical for focusing appropriate therapies, yet the tools to risk categorize this subpopulation do not exist. Our objective was to identify predictors of “escalated care” in bronchiolitis. We hypothesized there would be a significant association between escalated care and predictors in the emergency department. We subsequently developed a risk score for escalated care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of previously healthy infants agedDepartments International Collaborative (PREDICT) in Australia and New Zealand, Pediatric Emergency Research United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI), and Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM).33 The original study was approved by the PERN Executive Committee and the research ethics boards of all participating hospitals. Included children were younger than 12 months and diagnosed in a participating ED between January and December 2013 with bronchiolitis, defined as a viral respiratory infection with respiratory distress.1, 7 The first bronchiolitis was defined by no previous visits to a health care provider for bronchiolitis. Infants with comorbidities including chronic lung, cardiac, neuro-muscular disease, immune deficiencies, and renal or hepatic insufficiency were excluded. Study Protocol At each hospital, we identified consecutive infants who presented to the ED within the study period and had a discharge diagnosis of bronchiolitis or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (codes J 21.0, 21.8, 21.9/466.1). By using a random number generator, each site was used to identify a random sample of records for review. Trained abstractors identified eligible records and entered the data on standardized case report forms and into a secure web-based electronic database. Targeted information included demographics, presenting symptoms and physical examination in the ED, vital signs, transcutaneous oxygen saturation measured in triage in room air, disposition from the ED (discharge from the hospital, admission to inpatient ward or ICU), and airway support interventions constituting escalated care as defined below. We defined all study variables a priori and described them in a manual of operations with data source hierarchy for all data points. Trained site investigators ensured data extractors reviewed the manual. The manual of operations assisted with interpretation and standardized data extraction of variables somewhat subjective in nature. Before the study initiation, all coinvestigators reviewed the case report forms to assess feasibility of collecting the required information locally and to ensure information clarity. FREIRE et al2 by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was escalated care during the ED or inpatient stay, defined as hospitalization plus any of the following: HFNC, noninvasive ventilation (eg, continuous or biphasic positive airway pressure), intubation and ventilation, or management in the ICU without airway support. Although the criteria for ICU admission are variable16, 34 and those for HFNC have not yet been established, 35 these escalated care interventions are generally limited to children with hypoxia and concern respiratory distress.30 We did not include isolated use of intravenous or nasogastric hydration or supplemental oxygen in this definition because some institutions use intravenous or nasogastric hydration routinely on admission, 18 and the criteria for supplemental oxygen are disparate.36 The secondary outcome consisted of the diagnostic accuracy of the derived clinical risk score model for escalated care. Predictor Considerations We evaluated the following potential predictors of escalated care: age in months, duration of respiratory distress in days, documented prematurity, reported poor feeding, observed dehydration, observed nasal flaring and/or grunting, reported or observed apnea, respiratory rate in triage, chest retractions, and oxygen saturation measured in triage on room air.14, 16, 17, 19, 24 To develop the risk score, the continuous variables were dichotomized according to published evidence for severe bronchiolitis and recommendation for oxygen therapy.1, 16 Analyses The study sample size was estimated to provide 80% power to answer the primary association, on the basis of the multivariable logistic regression analysis with escalated care as the binary dependent variable. On the basis of previous literature, we estimated that 5% of infants presenting for ED care would be admitted to an ICU and that ∼5% of the remaining population would be managed with HFNC16 for a total proportion receiving escalated care of ∼10%. Targeting evaluation of 10 independent variables, with the requirement of at least 10 patients with the outcome per predictor variable and allowing for colinearity, we aimed to enroll at least 200 participants receiving escalated care. We thus required at least 2000 patients presenting to the ED with bronchiolitis. The patient characteristics were analyzed with descriptive statistics by using proportions for categorical data, means with SDs for normally distributed continuous data, and medians with ranges for continuous data lacking normal distributions. Relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated around targeted parameter estimates. We used bivariable analyses to determine the association between escalated care as a binary outcome and the independent variables explored, including an age of ≤2 months, 16 respiratory rate of ≥60 breaths per minute, 37 and oxygen saturation ofsites. Of these, 1580 visits fulfilled exclusion criteria, leaving 3725 eligible participants, of which 802 were managed at 8 Canadian pediatric EDs (PERC), 978 at 10 EDs in the United States (PEM-CRC and PECARN), 805 at 8 EDs in Australia and New Zealand (PREDICT), 841 at 9 EDs in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI), and 299 infants at 3 EDs in Europe (REPEM). The mean age of included participants was 4.5 ± 3.0 months, 2274 (61.1%) were boys, and the mean symptom duration was 2.9 ± 2.0 days. Escalated Care Of the 3725 eligible patients, 2722 (73.1%) had complete data for all variables. A total of 261 of 2722 (9.6%) study infants received escalated care, of which 164 (63%) were treated with HFNC, 47 (18%) received noninvasive ventilation, 12 (5%) were mechanically ventilated, and 38 (15%) received ICU care without airway support. Of the 164 HFNC treatments, 114 (70%) were delivered on inpatient wards. The characteristics of the infants who did and did not receive escalated care appear in Table 1. The rates of escalated care ranged from 3.6% in the United Kingdom and Ireland to 15.7% in Spain and Portugal. With Table 2, we summarize the bivariable associations between postulated predictors and escalated care. Multivariable Analysis The variables included in multivariable analysis included age, poor feeding, oxygen saturation, apnea, nasal flaring and/ or grunting, dehydration, retractions, and respiratory rate (Table 3). FREIRE et al4 TABLE 1 Characteristics of Infants With and Without Escalated Care Characteristic Escalated Care No Escalated Care P n = 261 n = 2461 Age, moa 2.9 ± 2.8 4.5 ± 2.9 2 0 Reference 2 months with oxygen saturations ≥90% and without nasal flaring and/or grunting, retractions, or hydration issues have a low probability of this outcome. The clinical risk score derived in a large and diverse infant population is used to quantify estimated risk for escalated care in bronchiolitis during the hospital stay, with a demonstrated high stability and discrimination ability. Most studies in which authors characterize infants with severe bronchiolitis have been focused on hospitalization, 9, 14, 17 –19, 25, 43 safe discharges from the ED, and ED length of stay.15, 20 However, clinical severity is only 1 factor involving the decision to hospitalize a child with bronchiolitis. Other factors include social, geographic, and cultural considerations. Past studies in which authors quantify the risk of hospitalization in bronchiolitis are also limited by the need for complex calculations14 and single- center design.19 In contrast, we have focused our outcome on receipt of escalated care because this subpopulation either suffers from or is at risk for developing respiratory decompensation and needs timely identification for optimal management. Although the clinical use of the risk score will need to be prospectively validated, it has the potentialto individualize bronchiolitis care by identifying infants who can be discharged from the hospital or observed in community hospitals versus those at risk for requiring care by teams skilled in airway support because of risk of escalated care. Research of infants with bronchiolitis receiving airway support has generally been focused on the inpatients, 21 – 23 especially infants admitted to ICUs.16, 24 –29 These studies had relatively small numbers of ICU patients, 16, 22 used single- center designs, 22, 26, 27 were focused on RSV bronchiolitis, 22, 25 – 27 or took place before the use of RSV immunoprophylaxis.25, 26 HFNC therapy has recently become a common airway support strategy in severe bronchiolitis.30, 44 –46 Although some physiological benefits of HFNC have been confirmed, 47 – 50 and the increasing use of HFNC may have contributed to a corresponding drop in intubation rates, 30, 50 – 53 we currently do not know which infants with bronchiolitis are the best candidates for this intervention. Although HFNC may have a role as a rescue treatment to prevent the need for ICU care in bronchiolitis, it does not appear to modify the underlying disease course.54 Furthermore, not all infants requiring airway support are admitted to the ICU. Many patients on HFNC appear to be candidates for ward therapy, 31, 55 – 57 as was the case in this study. The strongest predictor of escalated care was a triage oxygen saturation 60 breaths per minute, and retractions between these subgroups were both clinically and statistically significant (PNational Health Service Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK); Sian Copley, MBBS (City Hospitals Sunderland National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK); Kathryn Ferris, MB BCh BAO (Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK); Stuart Hartshorn, MB BChir (Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK); Christopher Hine, MBChB (Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK); Julie- Ann Maney, MB BCh BAO (Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK); Fintan McErlean (Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK); Niall Mullen, MB BCh (City Hospitals Sunderland National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK); Katherine Potier de la Morandiere, MBChB (Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester, UK); Stephen Mullen, MB BCh BAO (Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK); Juliette Oakley, MB BCh (The Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK); Nicola Oliver, MBBS (Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK); Colin Powell, MD (The Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK); Vandana Rajagopal, MBBS (The Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK); Shammi Ramlakhan, MBBS (Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK); John Rayner, MBChB (Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK); Sarah Raywood, MB BCh (Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester, UK); Damian Roland, MBBS, (Leicester Royal Infirmary Children’s Emergency Department, Leicester, UK); Siobhan Skirka, MBChB (Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, UK); Joanne Stone, MBChB (Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK). PREDICT: Meredith Borland, MBBS, FRACGP, FACEM (Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, WA, Australia); Simon Craig, MBBS (Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia); Amit Kochar, MD (Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia); David Krieser, MBBS (Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, VIC, Australia); Cara Lacey, MBBS (Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, VIC, Australia); Jocelyn Neutze, MBChB (Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand); Karthikeyan Velusamy, MD (Townsville Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia). REPEM: Javier Benito, MD, PHD (Pediatric Emergency Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain); Ana Sofia Fernandes, MD (Santa Maria Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal); Joana Gil, MD (Santa Maria Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal); Natalia Paniagua, MD (Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain); Gemma Claret Teruel, MD (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain); Yehezkel Waisman, MD (Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tiqva, Israel). Research Network and Development of Pediatric Emergency Medicine in Latin America: Pedro Bonifacio Rino, MD (Hospital de Pediatria Prof. Dr Juan P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina). PERN Executive Committee: Nathan Kuppermann (Chair), Stuart R. Dalziel (Vice Chair), James Chamberlain (PECARN), Santiago Mintegi (REPEM), Rakesh Mistry (PEM-CRC), Lise Nigrovic (PEM-CRC), Amy C. Plint (PERC), Damien Roland (PERUKI), Patrick Van de Voorde (REPEM). PERN Networks: Participating networks include the following: PECARN, PEM-CRC of the American Academy of Pediatrics, PERC, PERUKI, PREDICT, REPEM, and the Red de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediatrica Latinoamericana, which means Research Network and Development of Pediatric Emergency Medicine in Latin America (Argentine-Uruguayan network). We thank Judy Sweeney and Maggie Rumantir for their generous contribution to coordinating this study and Henna Mian for her administrative assistance with the study. ABBREVIATIONS AUC: area under the curve CI: confidence interval ED: emergency department HFNC: high-flow nasal cannula OR: odds ratio PECARN: Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network PEM-CRC: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee PERC: Pediatric Emergency Research Canada PERN: Pediatric Emergency Research Networks PERUKI: Pediatric Emergency Research United Kingdom and Ireland PREDICT: Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative REPEM: Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine RSV: respiratory syncytial virus FREIRE et al8 by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from REFERENCES 1. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al; American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 134/ 5/ e1474 2. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):588–598 3. Hasegawa K, Tsugawa Y, Brown DF, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Trends in bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States, 2000-2009. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):28–36 4. Pelletier AJ, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Direct medical costs of bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2418–2423 5. Garcia-Marcos L, Valverde-Molina J, Pavlovic-Nesic S, et al; BCOST group. Pediatricians’ attitudes and costs of bronchiolitis in the emergency department: a prospective multicentre study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(10):1011–1019 6. Ehlken B, Ihorst G, Lippert B, et al; PRIDE Study Group. Economic impact of community-acquired and nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections in young children in Germany. Eur J Pediatr. 2005;164(10):607–615 7. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1774–1793 8. Friedman JN, Rieder MJ, Walton JM; Canadian Paediatric Society, Acute Care Committee, Drug Therapy and Hazardous Substances Committee. Bronchiolitis: Recommendations for diagnosis, monitoring and management of children one to 24 months of age. Paediatr Child Health. 2014;19(9):485–498 9. Voets S, van Berlaer G, Hachimi-Idrissi S. Clinical predictors of the severity of bronchiolitis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006;13(3):134–138 10. Turner T, Wilkinson F, Harris C, Mazza D; Health for Kids Guideline Development Group. Evidence based guideline for the management of bronchiolitis. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37 (6, spec no):6–13 11. Barben J, Kuehni CE, Trachsel D, Hammer J; Swiss Paediatric Respiratory Research Group. Management of acute bronchiolitis: can evidence based guidelines alter clinical practice? Thorax. 2008;63(12):1103–1109 12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Bronchiolitis in children: diagnosis and management. June 2016. Available at: nice. org. uk/ guidance/ qs122. Accessed July 12, 2018 13. Working Group of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Acute Bronchiolitis; Quality Plan for the Spanish National Healthcare System of the Spanish Ministry for Health and Social Policy; Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Acute Bronchiolitis. Madrid, Spain: Ministry for Science Innovation; 2010 14. Walsh P, Rothenberg SJ, O’Doherty S, Hoey H, Healy R. A validated clinical model to predict the need for admission and length of stay in children with acute bronchiolitis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2004;11(5):265–272 15. Mansbach JM, Clark S, Barcega BR, Haddad H, Camargo CA Jr. Factors associated with longer emergency department length of stay for children with bronchiolitis : a prospective PEDIATRICS Volume 142, number 3, September 2018 9 Lisbon, Portugal; lDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; mDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; nEmergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children and Faculty of Health andApplied Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom; pDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri; qDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas; and rPediatric Emergency Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain Dr Freire conceived the study, cowrote the study protocol, and wrote the manuscript; Dr Kuppermann designed the study and provided major input into the concept and analysis of the study and drafting and revision of the manuscript; Dr Zemek designed the study and provided major input into the concept and analysis of the study and drafting and revision of the manuscript; Drs Freedman, Plint, Babl, Dalziel, Steele, Fernandes, Florin, Kharbanda, Lyttle, Johnson, Schnadower, and Benito designed the study, drafted the manuscript, and revised it for intellectual content; Mr Atenafu conducted the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript for intellectual content; Mr Stephens conducted the analysis and revised the manuscript for intellectual content; Dr Macias designed the study, provided extensive database support, drafted the manuscript, and revised it for intellectual content; Dr Schuh conceived the study, cowrote the study protocol, wrote the manuscript, and revised it critically for intellectual content; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted. DOI: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2017- 4253 Accepted for publication May 21, 2018 Address correspondence to Suzanne Schuh, MD, FRCP(C), Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8. E-mail: suzanne.schuh@sickkids.ca PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. FUNDING: No external funding. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ doi/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2018- 1982. by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/134/5/e1474 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/134/5/e1474 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/134/5/e1474 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs122 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs122 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-4253 mailto: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2018-1982 multicenter study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25(10):636–641 16. Damore D, Mansbach JM, Clark S, Ramundo M, Camargo CA Jr. Prospective multicenter bronchiolitis study: predicting intensive care unit admissions. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(10):887–894 17. Yusuf S, Caviness AC, Adekunle-Ojo AO. Risk factors for admission in children with bronchiolitis from pediatric emergency department observation unit. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(11):1132–1135 18. Corneli HM, Zorc JJ, Holubkov R, et al; Bronchiolitis Study Group for the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Bronchiolitis: clinical characteristics associated with hospitalization and length of stay. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(2):99–103 19. Marlais M, Evans J, Abrahamson E. Clinical predictors of admission in infants with acute bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(7):648–652 20. Mansbach JM, Clark S, Christopher NC, et al. Prospective multicenter study of bronchiolitis: predicting safe discharges from the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):680–688 21. Dadlez NM, Esteban-Cruciani N, Khan A, Douglas LC, Shi Y, Southern WN. Risk factors for respiratory decompensation among healthy infants with bronchiolitis. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(9):530–535 22. Brooks AM, McBride JT, McConnochie KM, Aviram M, Long C, Hall CB. Predicting deterioration in previously healthy infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics. 1999;104(3, pt 1):463–467 23. Hasegawa K, Pate BM, Mansbach JM, et al. Risk factors for requiring intensive care among children admitted to ward with bronchiolitis. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(1):77–81 24. Kneyber MC, Brandenburg AH, de Groot R, et al. Risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus associated apnoea. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157(4):331–335 25. Wang EE, Law BJ, Stephens D. Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) prospective study of risk factors and outcomes in patients hospitalized with respiratory syncytial viral lower respiratory tract infection. J Pediatr. 1995;126(2):212–219 26. McConnochie KM, Hall CB, Walsh EE, Roghmann KJ. Variation in severity of respiratory syncytial virus infections with subtype. J Pediatr. 1990;117(1, pt 1):52–62 27. Purcell K, Fergie J. Driscoll Children’s Hospital respiratory syncytial virus database: risk factors, treatment and hospital course in 3308 infants and young children, 1991 to 2002. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(5):418–423 28. Mansbach JM, Piedra PA, Stevenson MD, et al; MARC-30 Investigators. Prospective multicenter study of children with bronchiolitis requiring mechanical ventilation. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 130/ 3/ e492 29. Willwerth BM, Harper MB, Greenes DS. Identifying hospitalized infants who have bronchiolitis and are at high risk for apnea. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(4):441–447 30. Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Gelbart B, et al; Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes & Resource Evaluation (CORE) and the Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group. Burden of disease and change in practice in critically ill infants with bronchiolitis. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(6):1601648 31. Mayfield S, Bogossian F, O’Malley L, Schibler A. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for infants with bronchiolitis: pilot study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(5):373–378 32. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):961–964 33. Schuh S, Babl FE, Dalziel SR, et al; Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN). Practice variation in acute bronchiolitis: a Pediatric Emergency Research Networks Study. Pediatrics. 2017;140(6):e20170842 34. Willson DF, Horn SD, Hendley JO, Smout R, Gassaway J. Effect of practice variation on resource utilization in infants hospitalized for viral lower respiratory illness. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):851–855 35. Milési C, Boubal M, Jacquot A, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: recommendations for daily practice in pediatrics. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:29 36. Zorc JJ, Hall CB. Bronchiolitis: recent evidence on diagnosis and management. Pediatrics. 2010;125(2):342–349 37. O’Leary F, Hayen A, Lockie F, Peat J. Defining normal ranges and centiles for heart and respiratory rates in infants and children: a cross-sectional study of patients attending an Australian tertiary hospital paediatric emergency department. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(8):733–737 38. Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(5):464–469 39. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23(10):1631–1660 40. Beyene J, Atenafu EG, Hamid JS, To T, Sung L. Determining relative importance of variables in developing and validating predictive models. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:64 41. Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, NY:Springer; 2010:53–85 42. Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, NY: Springer; 2015 43. Chamberlain JM, Patel KM, Pollack MM. Association of emergency department care factors with admission and discharge decisions for pediatric patients. J Pediatr. 2006;149(5):644–649 44. Essouri S, Laurent M, Chevret L, et al. Improved clinical and economic outcomes in severe bronchiolitis with pre-emptive nCPAP ventilatory strategy. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(1):84–91 FREIRE et al10 by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/130/3/e492 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/130/3/e492 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/130/3/e492 45. Lazner MR, Basu AP, Klonin H. Non- invasive ventilation for severe bronchiolitis: analysis and evidence. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47(9):909–916 46. Schlapbach LJ, Schaefer J, Brady AM, Mayfield S, Schibler A. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support in interhospital transport of critically ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(4):592–599 47. Hough JL, Pham TM, Schibler A. Physiologic effect of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(5):e214–e219 48. Milési C, Baleine J, Matecki S, et al. Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1170]. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1088–1094 49. Pham TM, O’Malley L, Mayfield S, Martin S, Schibler A. The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(7):713–720 50. Schibler A, Pham TM, Dunster KR, et al. Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):847–852 51. Ganu SS, Gautam A, Wilkins B, Egan J. Increase in use of non-invasive ventilation for infants with severe bronchiolitis is associated with decline in intubation rates over a decade. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(7):1177–1183 52. Abboud PA, Roth PJ, Skiles CL, Stolfi A, Rowin ME. Predictors of failure in infants with viral bronchiolitis treated with high-flow, high-humidity nasal cannula therapy*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(6):e343–e349 53. Arora B, Mahajan P, Zidan MA, Sethuraman U. Nasopharyngeal airway pressures in bronchiolitis patients treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(11):1179–1184 54. Kepreotes E, Whitehead B, Attia J, et al. High-flow warm humidified oxygen versus standard low-flow nasal cannula oxygen for moderate bronchiolitis (HFWHO RCT): an open, phase 4, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10072):930–939 55. Bressan S, Balzani M, Krauss B, Pettenazzo A, Zanconato S, Baraldi E. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward: a pilot study. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(12):1649–1656 56. Mikalsen IB, Davis P, Øymar K. High flow nasal cannula in children: a literature review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:93 57. Bueno Campaña M, Olivares Ortiz J, Notario Muñoz C, et al. High flow therapy versus hypertonic saline in bronchiolitis: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(6):511–515 58. Cunningham S, Rodriguez A, Adams T, et al; Bronchiolitis of Infancy Discharge Study (BIDS) Group. Oxygen saturation targets in infants with bronchiolitis (BIDS): a double-blind, randomised, equivalence trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9998):1041–1048 59. Johnson DW, Adair C, Brant R, Holmwood J, Mitchell I. Differences in admission rates of children with bronchiolitis by pediatric and general emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2002;110(4). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 110/ 4/ e49 60. Gorelick MH. Severity of illness measures for pediatric emergency care: are we there yet? Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(5):639–643 61. Chamberlain JM, Patel KM, Pollack MM. The Pediatric Risk of Hospital Admission score: a second-generation severity-of- illness score for pediatric emergency patients. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):388–395 62. Duncan H, Hutchison J, Parshuram CS. The Pediatric Early Warning System score: a severity of illness score to predict urgent medical need in hospitalized children. J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):271–278 63. Ducharme FM, Chalut D, Plotnick L, et al. The pediatric respiratory assessment measure: a valid clinical score for assessing acute asthma severity from toddlers to teenagers. J Pediatr. 2008;152(4):476–480.e1 PEDIATRICS Volume 142, number 3, September 2018 11 by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/4/e49 www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/4/e49 7434 Pencil DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-4253 originally published online August 20, 2018; 2018;142;Pediatrics Schuh and for the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN) David W. Johnson, David Schnadower, Charles G. Macias, Javier Benito, Suzanne Steele, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Todd A. Florin, Anupam Kharbanda, Mark D. Lyttle, Stuart R. Dalziel, Stephen B. Freedman, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Derek Stephens, Dale W. Gabrielle Freire, Nathan Kuppermann, Roger Zemek, Amy C. Plint, Franz E. Babl, Predicting Escalated Care in Infants With Bronchiolitis Services Updated Information & http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253 including high resolution figures, can be found at: References http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253#BIBL This article cites 59 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: Subspecialty Collections http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/bronchiolitis_sub Bronchiolitis http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/pulmonology_sub Pulmonology sub http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergency_medicine_ Emergency Medicine following collection(s): This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the Permissions & Licensing http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml in its entirety can be found online at: Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or Reprints http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml Information about ordering reprints can be found online: by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from http://http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253#BIBL http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergency_medicine_sub http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergency_medicine_sub http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/pulmonology_sub http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/bronchiolitis_sub http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-4253 originally published online August 20, 2018; 2018;142;Pediatrics Schuh and for the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN) David W. Johnson, David Schnadower, Charles G. Macias, Javier Benito, Suzanne Steele, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Todd A. Florin, Anupam Kharbanda, Mark D. Lyttle, Stuart R. Dalziel, Stephen B. Freedman, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Derek Stephens, Dale W. Gabrielle Freire, Nathan Kuppermann, Roger Zemek, Amy C. Plint, Franz E. Babl, Predicting Escalated Care in Infants With Bronchiolitis http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253 located on the World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/suppl/2018/08/16/peds.2017-4253.DCSupplemental Data Supplement at: 1073-0397. ISSN:60007. Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rightsreserved. Print the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it by guest on January 27, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/3/e20174253 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/suppl/2018/08/16/peds.2017-4253.DCSupplemental