EXIN SIAM Professional Exam SIAMP Updated Dumps

Text Material Preview

<p>SIAMP</p><p>Exam Name: EXIN SIAM Professional Exam</p><p>Full version: 56 Q&As</p><p>Full version of SIAMP Dumps</p><p>Share some SIAMP exam dumps below.</p><p>1. The ZYX Board of Directors is considering which SIAM structure should be selected for the</p><p>ZYX SIAM model</p><p>What is most likely to influence the selection?</p><p>A. Planned expansion of ZYX into other countries</p><p>B. The attitude of the ZYXUK Directors</p><p>1 / 12</p><p>https://www.certqueen.com/SIAMP.html</p><p>C. The content of the report from SIAMRUS</p><p>D. Understanding existing capabilities in ZYX</p><p>Answer: D</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Selection Criteria:</p><p>Choosing the appropriate SIAM structure involves assessing various factors that influence the</p><p>organization's ability to implement and manage the model effectively. Existing Capabilities:</p><p>Understanding the current capabilities within ZYX is crucial as it determines the organization’s</p><p>readiness for different SIAM structures.</p><p>This includes evaluating the skills, processes, and infrastructure already in place.</p><p>Influence on Structure:</p><p>The existing capabilities will help decide whether an internal, external, hybrid, or lead supplier</p><p>model is most suitable.</p><p>If ZYX has strong internal capabilities, it may lean towards an internal or hybrid model.</p><p>Conversely, if capabilities are lacking, an external integrator might be preferred. Strategic</p><p>Alignment:</p><p>Aligning the SIAM structure with existing capabilities ensures that the transition is smooth, cost-</p><p>effective, and aligned with strategic goals.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on SIAM Structure Selection</p><p>ITIL 4: Create, Deliver and Support (CDS), Section on Assessing Organizational Capabilities</p><p>Reference: SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on SIAM Structure and</p><p>Sourcing ITIL 4: Direct, Plan and Improve (DPI), Section on Strategic Planning</p><p>2. The CEO has asked SIAMRUS to assist in the Discovery and Strategy stage. Given this</p><p>stage, SIAMRUS is not appointed as the service integrator yet. The first task assigned to</p><p>SIAMRUS is to analyze the current ZYX services and service providers.</p><p>OUTSCO has refused to provide any information to SIAMRUS because they are a competitor</p><p>SIAMRUS still needs information to create a baseline assessment</p><p>What is the best approach for SIAMRUS to get the necessary information about OUTSCO and</p><p>its services'?</p><p>A. Analyze the current and historic OUTSCO related incidents recorded in the ZYXS service</p><p>desk tool</p><p>B. Ask the ZYXH contract governance team to formally instruct OUTSCO to provide the</p><p>information</p><p>C. Rely on the analysis of services and providers included in the report prepared by the CIO</p><p>D. Review the OUTSCO contract and performance reports with the ZYXUK service delivery</p><p>2 / 12</p><p>managers</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Information Gathering: SIAMRUS needs comprehensive information about current services and</p><p>service providers to create a baseline assessment during the Discovery and Strategy stage.</p><p>Formal Instruction: As OUTSCO has refused to provide information due to competition</p><p>concerns, a formal instruction from the ZYXH contract governance team can mandate</p><p>compliance. This leverages contractual obligations and authority.</p><p>Contractual Authority: The contract governance team has the authority to enforce contract terms</p><p>and can compel OUTSCO to provide the necessary information.</p><p>Alternative Approaches:</p><p>Analyzing incident records (Option A) may provide limited insights and lacks the comprehensive</p><p>data needed.</p><p>Relying on the CIO's report (Option C) might not provide up-to-date or complete information.</p><p>Reviewing contracts and performance reports with service delivery managers (Option D) could</p><p>help but may not yield all required details.</p><p>Conclusion: Formal instruction from the ZYXH contract governance team is the most effective</p><p>approach to ensure compliance and obtain the necessary information for a thorough baseline</p><p>assessment.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Discovery and Strategy</p><p>SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Information Gathering and Contract Management</p><p>Sections</p><p>3. ZYX have decided to use the external service integrator structure The ZYX CEO wants to</p><p>minimize risks to service availability. In order to avoid reliance on single service providers the</p><p>CEO wants to use four different providers for hosting There will be one service provider for</p><p>hosting for each of the following countries</p><p>- the UK</p><p>- Germany</p><p>- the Netherlands</p><p>- Australia</p><p>To provide resilience every application used by ZYX will be hosted by three different hosting</p><p>service providers</p><p>The CEO wants to ensure a rapid introduction of new services and service providers She also</p><p>wants to ensure that the costs for the service integrator are as low as possible The ZYXH legal</p><p>team does not want to make the drafting of the contracts more difficult than necessary</p><p>3 / 12</p><p>It is clear that there is a single structure needed for the service integrator contract</p><p>Which contract structure is the most appropriate for ZYX?</p><p>A. Adopt that same structure for the hosting provider contracts</p><p>B. Adopt a single structure for the hosting provider contracts</p><p>C. Adopt custom structures for each hosting provider contract</p><p>D. Ask the hosting providers to provide their own structure.</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Understanding the Scenario:</p><p>ZYX wants to minimize risks to service availability by using four different providers for hosting in</p><p>the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.</p><p>Each application will be hosted by three different providers to ensure resilience.</p><p>The CEO aims for rapid introduction of new services, low costs for the service integrator, and</p><p>simplified contract drafting.</p><p>Analyzing the Options:</p><p>Option A: Adopting the same structure for all hosting provider contracts might reduce complexity</p><p>but doesn’t address the requirement for a single contract structure.</p><p>Option C: Custom structures for each hosting provider contract would complicate the contract</p><p>drafting process, going against the legal team’s preference.</p><p>Option D: Allowing hosting providers to provide their own structure would lead to inconsistencies</p><p>and difficulties in managing multiple contracts.</p><p>Selecting the Optimal Approach:</p><p>Option B: Adopting a single structure for all hosting provider contracts ensures consistency,</p><p>simplifies the management process, and aligns with the legal team's requirement to avoid</p><p>complexity in contract drafting. It also supports rapid service introduction and cost efficiency by</p><p>streamlining contract management.</p><p>Justification:</p><p>A single contract structure facilitates easier management and integration across different</p><p>providers, which is critical for maintaining service resilience and availability.</p><p>This approach aligns with SIAM principles of consistent and streamlined service integration and</p><p>management.</p><p>4. ZYX has decided to create an internal service provider for application development and</p><p>support This new service provider is formed by merging relevant staff from every ZYX company</p><p>with the necessary capabilities and skills.</p><p>This internal service provider will operate from multiple locations, which enables the provision of</p><p>4 / 12</p><p>year-round 24-hour support.</p><p>A capability framework for application development and support is drawn up for the new internal</p><p>service provider</p><p>What will the development of the capability framework help to address?</p><p>A. Establish a process forum for application development and support</p><p>B. Map skill levels for application development and support roles</p><p>C. Support effective working between staff in the different locations</p><p>D. Understand the boundaries and interactions with other service providers</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Capability Framework: Developing a capability framework for application development and</p><p>support helps in defining the necessary skills, competencies, and roles required for effective</p><p>service delivery. Skill Mapping: Mapping</p><p>skill levels for application development and support</p><p>roles ensures that the internal service provider has the right capabilities in place to meet</p><p>operational demands and deliver high-quality services.</p><p>Effective Working: While supporting effective working between staff in different locations (Option</p><p>C) and understanding boundaries and interactions with other service providers (Option D) are</p><p>important, they are broader objectives that rely on having a well-defined capability framework</p><p>first. Process Forum: Establishing a process forum (Option A) can be a subsequent step, but it</p><p>is not the primary purpose of a capability framework.</p><p>Strategic Alignment: By mapping skill levels, ZYX ensures that their internal service provider is</p><p>equipped with the necessary expertise and can effectively support application development and</p><p>operations across multiple locations.</p><p>Conclusion: The development of a capability framework is most directly aimed at mapping skill</p><p>levels, which is foundational for ensuring that the new internal service provider can operate</p><p>effectively.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Capability and</p><p>Competency Frameworks</p><p>SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Skill Mapping and Role Definition Sections</p><p>5. The SIAM strategy for ZYX has been agreed:</p><p>- There will be a mix of new service providers and continuing existing service providers</p><p>- An external service integrator will be appointed</p><p>- ZYXS will provide the service desk.</p><p>- An agreement has been reached with OUTSCO to extend their contract to provide services to</p><p>ZYXUK by two years</p><p>5 / 12</p><p>As key activities for the critical path to implement the SIAM model for ZYX, three parties must</p><p>be transitioned into the SIAM model (listed in random order):</p><p>- continuing service providers</p><p>- the service integrator</p><p>- new service providers</p><p>In this instance, which sequence of activities offers the least risk to continuity of service for all</p><p>ZYX companies'?</p><p>A. All parties at the same time</p><p>B. First the continuing service providers, then the service integrator and the new service</p><p>providers last</p><p>C. First the service integrator, then the new service provider, and the continuing service</p><p>providers last</p><p>D. First the service integrator, then both continuing and new service providers at the same time</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Service Continuity: Ensuring continuity of service is critical during the transition to a SIAM</p><p>model.</p><p>Phasing the transition in a manner that minimizes risk is essential.</p><p>Phased Transition: Starting with the continuing service providers helps to stabilize the current</p><p>environment before introducing new variables (service integrator and new providers).</p><p>Role of Service Integrator: Once the continuing providers are integrated, the service integrator</p><p>can then take over the management of the SIAM ecosystem. This ensures that the integrator</p><p>has a stable foundation to work with.</p><p>Introducing New Providers: Bringing in new service providers last minimizes disruption and</p><p>allows the service integrator to establish robust governance and management practices first.</p><p>Alternative Sequences:</p><p>Transitioning all parties simultaneously (Option A) carries high risk of service disruption.</p><p>Starting with the service integrator or new providers first (Options C and D) before stabilizing</p><p>current services could lead to significant operational challenges.</p><p>Conclusion: The sequence of first transitioning the continuing service providers, followed by the</p><p>service integrator, and finally the new service providers offers the least risk and ensures a</p><p>smooth</p><p>transition process.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Transition Planning and</p><p>Support SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Service Transition Sections</p><p>6 / 12</p><p>6. ZYX has decided to appoint ZYXS as service integrator using the lead supplier structure</p><p>ZYXS will need to fill new roles with additional skilled resources The contract with OUTSCO will</p><p>be terminated, and all the component services will be transitioned to FIELD$CO: MAILSCO.</p><p>NETSCO. ZYXD and ZYXS The SIAM Project Board has just agreed that after the transition</p><p>there will no longer be a requirement for service delivery managers in ZYXUK to manage the</p><p>outsourced contract with OUTSCO</p><p>What is the best way to deal with this situation?</p><p>A. Conduct a SIAM awareness campaign across all ZYX companies, briefing all staff about the</p><p>benefits of moving to a SIAM model Ensure that the possibility of staff redundancies is not</p><p>mentioned until the transition plan has been agreed</p><p>B. Directly inform the two service delivery managers as soon as possible and invite them to</p><p>Amsterdam to meet the ZYXS staff Ask them to be part of the team designing the SIAM model</p><p>and encourage them to apply for the new roles</p><p>C. inform the ZYXUK Directors of the situation and ask them to review the employment</p><p>contracts of the service delivery managers. Once they are satisfied that there is no risk to</p><p>sensitive data, inform the staff that their role will be redundant</p><p>D. Leave the service delivery managers in uncertainty about whether their role will cease to</p><p>exist or not. Offer them a financial incentive to be part of the transition team and stay with</p><p>ZYXUK until the end if they decide they want to leave</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Situation Overview:</p><p>The termination of the contract with OUTSCO and the transition to a lead supplier structure with</p><p>ZYXS as the service integrator has made the roles of the service delivery managers redundant.</p><p>Communication and Involvement:</p><p>Directly informing the service delivery managers promptly shows transparency and respect,</p><p>reducing uncertainty and speculation.</p><p>Inviting them to participate in designing the new SIAM model involves them in the transition</p><p>process, utilizing their experience and knowledge, and helping them feel valued. Opportunity for</p><p>New Roles:</p><p>Encouraging the service delivery managers to apply for new roles within the SIAM ecosystem</p><p>provides them with career opportunities and helps retain experienced staff.</p><p>This approach demonstrates a commitment to employee development and continuity.</p><p>Minimizing Resistance:</p><p>By involving the service delivery managers in the transition, their potential resistance to change</p><p>can be minimized, ensuring a smoother transition process.</p><p>7 / 12</p><p>Reference: SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK) recommends early and clear</p><p>communication with impacted staff during transitions.</p><p>ITIL 4: Create, Deliver and Support (CDS) emphasizes the importance of engaging and</p><p>involving staff</p><p>in change initiatives.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Organizational Change</p><p>Management ITIL 4: Create, Deliver and Support (CDS), Section on Workforce and Talent</p><p>Management</p><p>7. ZYX has gathered information about their current services. The CEO wants to keep up the</p><p>momentum in the project by arranging a contract with SIAMRUS to be the external service</p><p>integrator using their proposed SIAM model.</p><p>The CIO wants to investigate alternative service integration offerings and structures., to mitigate</p><p>possible nsks. The CEO has agreed to this</p><p>Considering the ZYX mandate for change and the ZYX corporate strategy, what is the best way</p><p>to conduct this investigation?</p><p>A. Research the marketplace for potential external providers and assess current internal</p><p>capabilities.</p><p>a. Analyze each potential provider's capabilities and alignment with ZYX's requirements and</p><p>current service model</p><p>b. Select the best providers to informally test the validity of the proposed SIAM model</p><p>B. Research the marketplace for potential service integrators that can deliver ZYX's</p><p>requirements</p><p>a. Rank the organizations which match the ZYX profile according to their position in the</p><p>marketplace by using benchmarks</p><p>b. Invite only the market leader organization to bid for the supply of the service integration</p><p>services.</p><p>C. Select</p><p>all existing ZYX service providers for consideration, as these are familiar with ZYX -</p><p>Invite service integration proposals from all of these existing ZYX service providers</p><p>a. Assess the responses and invite the top three providers to bid for the provision of the service</p><p>integrator.</p><p>D. Use the SIAMRUS proposal as a basis to examine the marketplace for potential providers of</p><p>their SIAM model</p><p>a. Compare similar market offerings to validate the SIAM model and role of the service</p><p>integrator.</p><p>b. Maintain the project’s momentum by asking SIAMRUS to create an outline bid</p><p>8 / 12</p><p>Answer: A</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Mandate for Change: ZYX’s mandate for change requires a thorough investigation to ensure</p><p>the chosen service integration model aligns with its strategic goals and mitigates potential risks.</p><p>Marketplace Research: Exploring the marketplace for potential external service integrators</p><p>provides insights into available options and industry best practices.</p><p>Internal Capability Assessment: Evaluating current internal capabilities helps determine if</p><p>internal resources can be leveraged or improved to meet SIAM requirements.</p><p>Provider Analysis: Analyzing potential providers based on their capabilities and alignment with</p><p>ZYX’s specific needs ensures a tailored fit, reducing implementation risks.</p><p>Informal Testing: Informally testing the validity of the proposed SIAM model with selected</p><p>providers</p><p>allows ZYX to gauge the practical applicability and make adjustments before formal</p><p>engagement.</p><p>Strategic Fit and Validation: This approach ensures that the final selection of the service</p><p>integrator is</p><p>well-informed, validated, and aligned with ZYX’s strategic objectives, ensuring a smoother</p><p>transition</p><p>and better service outcomes.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Service Integration and</p><p>Management Strategy</p><p>SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Service Integrator Selection and Governance</p><p>Sections</p><p>8. The SIAM Project Board has decided that a big bang implementation approach is unsuitable</p><p>for ZYX What is the most likely reason for this decision?</p><p>A. Agile methods cannot be applied to a big bang implementation approach.</p><p>B. The current service provider contracts have different termination periods.</p><p>C. The service levels must be maintained throughout the entire transition</p><p>D. The ZYXUK Directors want to use the approach suggested by SIAMRUS</p><p>Answer: B</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Understanding Big Bang Implementation: A big bang implementation approach involves</p><p>transitioning all service elements simultaneously. This method is swift but high-risk, particularly</p><p>when dealing with multiple service providers.</p><p>Contractual Considerations: Different service providers often have contracts ending at various</p><p>9 / 12</p><p>times. Aligning all these to terminate simultaneously for a big bang approach is challenging and</p><p>impractical. This mismatch in termination periods means that transitioning all services at once</p><p>would likely lead to contract breaches, penalties, or service disruption.</p><p>Agile Methods Applicability: Agile methods focus on iterative and incremental delivery rather</p><p>than a single, all-encompassing change. Although Agile could be challenging in a big bang</p><p>approach, it’s not the primary reason for ZYX's decision.</p><p>Service Level Maintenance: Maintaining consistent service levels is critical during any transition.</p><p>A phased approach ensures better control and less disruption, ensuring continuous service</p><p>delivery. Strategic Alignment: Although the preferences of directors and external suggestions</p><p>(like from SIAMRUS) influence decisions, they are not the fundamental reasons behind avoiding</p><p>a big bang approach.</p><p>Conclusion: The core issue lies in the contractual termination periods, making a phased</p><p>implementation more feasible and less risky.</p><p>Reference: SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Implementation</p><p>Approaches SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Contract Management Sections</p><p>9. What best describes ZYX's strategic drivers for transitioning to a SIAM model?</p><p>A. To enable the design implementation operation and improvement of integrated end-to-end</p><p>services</p><p>• To ensure that these services are aligned with the ZYX corporate objectives, and allow</p><p>problematic legacy systems to be retired</p><p>B. To reduce the overhead and cost of managing an increasing number of service providers</p><p>across the different ZYX companies</p><p>- To reduce the incidence of contract overlap, where more than one provider is being paid to</p><p>deliver the same service within ZYX</p><p>C. To reduce the risk of the service providers operating in silos, focused on their own targets</p><p>rather than the wider end-to-end service</p><p>- To promote collaboration between providers in seeking ways to reduce IT operating costs and</p><p>enable Agile development of new services C.</p><p>D. To reduce the costs of operating IT. while at the same time ensuring that agreed service</p><p>levels are met</p><p>- To enable IT capabilities that support agility and rapid expansion of the ZYX business into new</p><p>geographical areas</p><p>Answer: C</p><p>Explanation:</p><p>Introduction:</p><p>10 / 12</p><p>This question pertains to understanding the strategic drivers for ZYX's transition to a Service</p><p>Integration and Management (SIAM) model.</p><p>SIAM is a methodology used to manage multiple service providers and integrate them to</p><p>provide a single business-facing IT organization.</p><p>Analyzing the Options: Option A:</p><p>Focuses on enabling the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of integrated end-</p><p>to-end services.</p><p>Aligns these services with ZYX corporate objectives and allows for the retirement of problematic</p><p>legacy systems.</p><p>This option is strategic but doesn't emphasize cost reduction or collaboration. Option B:</p><p>Aims to reduce the overhead and cost of managing multiple service providers across ZYX</p><p>companies. Focuses on reducing contract overlaps, where more than one provider delivers the</p><p>same service. This option highlights cost management but not the risk reduction or collaboration</p><p>aspect.</p><p>Option C:</p><p>Reduces the risk of service providers operating in silos, focusing on their targets rather than the</p><p>wider end-to-end service.</p><p>Promotes collaboration between providers to reduce IT operating costs and enable Agile</p><p>development of new services.</p><p>This option aligns well with SIAM principles by emphasizing collaboration, risk reduction, and</p><p>cost efficiency.</p><p>Reference: Collaboration between providers and Agile development are key aspects of SIAM</p><p>implementation as highlighted in various ITIL and SIAM best practice documents.</p><p>Option D:</p><p>Focuses on reducing IT operation costs while ensuring agreed service levels.</p><p>Aims to support agility and rapid expansion into new geographical areas.</p><p>Although important, it doesn’t address the integrated end-to-end service or the specific</p><p>collaboration between providers.</p><p>Conclusion:</p><p>Option C is the most comprehensive and best aligns with SIAM's strategic drivers by addressing</p><p>the reduction of silos, promoting collaboration, cost reduction, and enabling Agile development.</p><p>11 / 12</p><p>More Hot Exams are available.</p><p>350-401 ENCOR Exam Dumps</p><p>350-801 CLCOR Exam Dumps</p><p>200-301 CCNA Exam Dumps</p><p>Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)</p><p>12 / 12</p><p>https://www.certqueen.com/promotion.asp</p><p>https://www.certqueen.com/350-401.html</p><p>https://www.certqueen.com/350-801.html</p><p>https://www.certqueen.com/200-301.html</p><p>http://www.tcpdf.org</p>